Yahoo! Rich Ads in Search

Yahoo Search Marketing recently announced that they are launching their Rich Ads in Search program with a few household names to test the integration of video and images into the Paid Search Results. They are calling this program Rich Ads in Search, and it allows an advertiser to place images, video and custom search boxes into the paid search ad.

A limited group of advertisers tested it in the fourth quarter of 2008 and saw click-through rates rise by as much as 25 percent. They’ve also seen improved brand exposure and conversion rates. It remains to be seen how this can improve the results for the small to mid sized business, who don’t have the same kind of brand recognition as the trial companies, but the editor of Yahoo! Search Marketing’s blog, Jeff Sweat, is very enthusiastic about the results:

What can rich ads do?
The Rich Ads in Search program is being shared with a small number of brand advertisers such as Pedigree and Esurance and agencies such as Razorfish. The program lets advertisers:

• Post images and video, which can increase the branding impact of search advertising. Pedigree has added video to its campaigns, for instance.
• Create deep links to relevant pages, which can help drive conversions directly from the Yahoo! search results page.
• Include boxes within the listing that lets users search for their desired product or a store location directly without additional navigation. Esurance’s listing lets users enter their ZIP codes from the results page for insurance quotes.
• Show their logo, which enhances user trust.

Rich Ads in Search is currently by invitation only to a small group of our brand advertisers, but we will update you as it opens up. In the meantime, start thinking of what your search ads could do for you.

With an increase of 25% in conversion rates, it’s going to be labeled as a success. I wouldn’t argue that the initial results are positive. I would be cautiously optimistic about the potential. Why am I not ranting about the potential to use video and images to improve Paid Search?

Three Reasons I’m Not Ecstatic About Rich Ads in Search:

• Clicks to See the Model, not the Product – Remember the Paris Hilton commercial for Carl’s Jr? While that ad was definitely eye catching and memorable, I never got the urge to go and buy a hamburger. It helped me remember the name Carl’s Jr. but didn’t result in a sale. While this may be part of the advertising strategy, and I agree it will definitely lead to higher click through rate, I don’t know that this is going to positively affect purchases, which is the ultimate goal. A portion of your PPC budget gets wasted anyway, due to click fraud and other errant clicks, and I am just concerned that images may cause people to click so they can see an image, not necessarily buy the associated product.
• Helps the Big Guy, Hurts the Little Guy – I think that this will result in higher cost per ads as more big name retailers start to see Search Engine Marketing as a viable advertising model, and this is just the ammo that their ad agencies need to sell them on the idea. Ultimately I think this will work best for big brand names and companies that already have an existing brand following. I think the little shop with no corporate branding will be hurt, as they will lose the ability to compete in paid search with the large corporate budgets. Time to go back and work on that SEO strategy?
• Paid Search is Inefficient- I am not a big fan of paid search in general, as I feel it serves the Search Engine well, and is a great revenue model, but it doesn’t have enough safeguards to adequately protect the advertiser. Launching these ads reinforces my general belief. Yahoo! knows that images generate more interest, and will get more click-throughs, great for Yahoo!, maybe not so good for the advertiser. Since they can’t guarantee is that there will be more sales as a result, the only guarantee is that they get more clicks on the ads, and they generate more sales. Therein lies the problem.

I think that this was bound to be the natural progression, and I welcome the changes. Videos and images have been showing up in the natural results for some time now, but this is the first use in Paid Search. It definitely adds an interactive element to the results, and can provide a greater user experience in the end.

Whether this turns out to be good or bad for Internet Marketing, one thing is true, the traditional TV ad model is eroding, and they are losing serious ground to new media on the Internet. I would be very worried if I was one of the big conglomerates that runs the media stations.

I will do a follow up post on the positive aspects of this new feature, and the reasons I should be ecstatic about the launch of Yahoo! Rich Ads in Search.

Click Fraud Increasing

If you have been reading our blog you can easily see that we are not big fans of Pay Per Click advertising.  We rarely write about PPC, and in general we don’t recommend it to our clients, other than to supplement a Search Engine Optimization campaign.  It’s not that we don’t believe it has value in some situations, but our philosophy is that Paid Search Campaigns can be a good supplement to a Search Engine Optimization, especially in the early stages, but over the long term it is not as effective or efficient as a good Search Engine Optimization campaign.

This report by Click Forensics outlines the increase in Paid Search Click Fraud, and shows that the instances of click fraud are increasingly performed by Automated Bots.   In summary, 17.1% of all clickthroughs on paid search advertising are fraudulent, an increase from 16.3% in 2008.

More disturbing is the fact that 30% of all click fraud is being done by automated bots, which leads us to believe that the trend will only continue.   To read the rest of the article, follow this link here – http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/report-click-fraud-at-record-high/

Pay Per Click Advertising

There are two ways to get your website ranked on the search engines: organically, and through paid search campaigns.  Which is better?  Each method has it’s own advantages, but the difference really is determined by your time horizon.

Paid Search campaigns Pay-per-click) offer immediate gratification.  You simply bid for keywords and if you’re the highest bidder your site will come up first for that keyword.   Very simple and easy to understand.

Organic Search listing are more complicated.  Organic Search results are not influenced by the amount of money the business is willing to spend, they are a collection of natural search results and processes.  Because of this, organic results take more time to develop, but they offer a higher return on investment because they are free.

Contact one of our consultants to get a more detailed explanation of the differences and your options as a business.